THE UNCHRISTIAN PARTY

We’ve been around since The Referendum.

The response to CoViD-19;

And the suicidal  self-abasement 

and self-flagellation

provoked by George Floyd

( τὸ κακὸν δοκεῖν 

ποτ᾽ ἐσθλὸν τῷδ᾽ ἔμμεν'  ὅτῳ 

φρένας θεὸς ἄγει πρὸς ἄταν )

persuaded us to draw the preparations

and the procrastinations to a close,

and to go public.

We’re a new type of Party.

We began in London

as a small group of disappointed UKIP-ers.

Now we’ve drawn in

disillusioned Conservatives,

Labourites,

even Greens.

Not many Lib Dems, though (!).

What used to be called “Entryism” must be the best policy.

Time is short.

WE ARE INSIDE

THE ESTABLISHED PARTIES.

We intend to influence or control the local groups –

or sabotage or destroy them.

With dedicated and talented activists,

much can easily be achieved.

We’ve not taken up the option of

registration with the Electoral Commission.

We need to protect our machinery.

And we need to guard against

infiltrators,

saboteurs,

moles,

spies.

You can’t join The UnChristian Party.

We observe your works.

We investigate you.

If we think you’re suitable for us,

and we’re suitable for you,

we get in touch.

Also:

Registration is more likely to damage any party’s

credibility or reputation

than enhance or secure it.

There are 368 registered political parties

in the UKofGBandNI;

parties such as –

Blue Revolution, Bolton For Change,

Chislehurst Matters, Elm Park Residents' Association,

Five Star Direct Democracy Party, Irish Republican Socialist Party,

National Flood Prevention Party, Pirate Party UK,

Reform 2000 Party, Sandown Independents,

Taking The Initiative Party, The Whig Party,

Wythall Residents' Association.

Any association with these would do us no good. 

FROM THE

UNCHRISTIAN PARTY

MANIFESTO;

EJACULATIONS 2.4.1 AND 3.4.3:

The suicidal response to CoViD-19

was Christianity in action.

The self-abasement and self-flagellation

provoked by George Floyd

was Christianity in action.

It used to be said,

when the U.S.A. and U.S.S.R. were pointing their I.C.B.M.s at each other,

that it’s man’s

(and we use the term advisedly)

man’s aggressive,

violent,

murderous nature

that will be the ruin of us.

Now,

this clearly is not true.

It’s Christian charity that’ll be our ruin.

The affected sanctimonious donning of sham/

fraudulent, counterfeit noblesse oblige,

the de haut en bas affectations,

the axiomatic self-abasement and self-flagellation,

the bleeding-heart “liberalism” –

The “P.C.”, the “Woke”:

These are just Christianity

and suicidal Christian charity

by another name.

The effete, lifeless Christianity of the

feeble,

reedy-voiced,

quivering-lipped,

hair-shirt-wearing

Anglican Bishop

is the real Christianity.

How the hell even just the mythology ever caught on

outside its immediate,

relevant,

appropriate sphere

is one of the great mysteries.

It’s as if some strange Israeli sect,

inspired by some destructive god,

accepted Mein Kampf as a New Testament of a new religion,

included the Edda as its Old Testament,

and set the whole thing to music

with selections from Wagner –

All in the veneration of Wotan-Hitler:

Evil appearing as good:

Insane suicidal masochism.

They may as well just

lie down on the floor

and say ‘Please shit in my mouth.’

 ...

If you can't be bothered to read all of our Manifesto,

just enjoy ejaculations 5.5.1.1 and 

3.1, 4.1, 4.2, 5.2, 5.3, and 1.2.2.

Please use the edition downloadable from this site - 

The 12th edition.

This edition contains:

(i) A new appendix - on page 360.

You'll find extensive information on

James O'Brien -

Why he features large in this document.

We've run this past O'Brien and LBC's owner,

and a troop of solicitors.

It isn't libelous.

(ii) A 109 page appendix -

"Notes towards a Commentary on Pascal,

Game Theory, Gyges and the

Thatcher-Prior-Major Corollary."

We've run this past 5,000 +

of the world's top academics in

Politics, Political Philosophy, and Theology

(and a few sociologists).

Our legal team has studied it.

As far as they know,

it isn't illegal.

(iii) Three clarifications regarding style.

(iv) A one-liner on eloquence.

(v) Clarification regarding Hume’s position on 

passion versus reason.

(vi) Immanuel Kant’s permission to accept 

the obvious.

(vii)  A conundrum involving Jesse Owens v.

"Might is Right".

(viii) A new ejaculation (16.1.2)  on Christian 

and UnChristian bedroom activities.

And (ix), apparently, some people revere Shakespeare, 

so we’ve added his eleventh sonnet 

(Bedroom Activities).

And (x), a VERY important addition to footnote 93.

Also (xi), we've adjusted/improved the formatting.

And (xii), if you're wondering what the hell

Spinoza has to do with economics,

you'll find the answer here.

All other versions floating around the web are out of date.